Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DownSouth who wrote (8034)	11/10/2000 12:06:04 PM
From: BirdDog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22706

It says two things: 1 The candidates have not been in local politics for a while. 2 The candidates are not of the majority party of the states. As per the Democratic Party of Tennessee offices. "There is no party registration in Tennessee. Although an extremely unscientific way of trying to keep tract. Which is trying to count the number of people who consistently vote in one parties primaries. This makes it about even. But there are a whole lot more voters who vote in the major elections which we cannot count one way or the other." As per documents provided through the Arkansas Secretary of States office. AS of the end of 1999 .........Democratic Party affiliation......2.2% of voters .........Republican Party Affiliation......0.93% of voters .........No Party Affiliation.............96.87% of voters Gee...I don't think I can let you get away with the first statement either. After all, Bush has NEVER been involved in local politics in those states. They have never known him at all. BirdDog