Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Angels of Alchemy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Man from Mars who wrote (19834)	11/10/2000 9:23:55 AM
From: Kevin McKenzie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24256

I agree. With 100,000,000 votes, there will always be a margin of error. It does scare me a bit that a dead man can win a seat in the Senate.

To: Bald Man from Mars who wrote (19834)	11/10/2000 9:28:26 AM
From: Jo Ellen T	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24256

Well, no, SR I didn't think 100% but it looks really bad for 100's of ballots to be 'lost'. I'm still angry at our town for 4 years ago when the machines didn't work, noone had delivered the write in ballots, and it did change the seating on Council, I think. There was no new election held. The people in charge of the machines just claimed that the machines worked, you just had to mark your votes in a certain order. Legally I think you have to totally ignore the riots and hoopla and just look at the legal issues. If the ballots were printed in an illegal manner then that's ILLEGAL, and they have a case for revoting. It makes no difference who approved the ballots. We don't pick and choose which laws we use, if they were printed in an illegal manner, they have a case for a revote IMO. JE