SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: limtex who wrote (14043)11/10/2000 12:45:37 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
judge is likely to say "you had your chance in ballot challenges"

it might be that simple

I heard of much gray area for ballot illegality
these guys seem like sour grape drinkers to me
they didnt object two months ago
PERIOD
/ jim



To: limtex who wrote (14043)11/10/2000 2:46:21 PM
From: Percival 917  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Hi limtex,

What strikes at the heart of the matter is that they only now decide that the WPB ballots were illegal? Is there no checks and balances to guide each county so that there are not discrepancies like this? Everyone is saying this ballot was used here in the last election. Was there no one who then found them illegal then? I guess it doesn't matter, since the Demos won that election. I wouldn't be surprised to have it come out that they knew they were illegal and could use this if Gore was losing. Paranoid? You betcha!!

Later,
Joel