Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nick who wrote (14121)	11/10/2000 1:50:25 PM
From: CAtechTrader	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

Nick, the Democrats CREATED THE BALLOT IN QUESTION, the Democrats SIGNED A WAIVER APPROVING THE BALLOT and Democrats SUPERVISED THE COUNTING AND QUALIFICATION of the ballots in question...now just where was this Republican Conspiracy to steal the election in all this? This is a coup and will destroy the integrity of American elections from this day forward if allowed to continue. If the recount had gone Gore's way I would want Bush to concede. The country is far more important than any party at this point.

To: Nick who wrote (14121)	11/10/2000 2:06:07 PM
From: Ex-INTCfan	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 65232

Now here's a thought -- If they don't resolve this by the time the new President is supposed to be sworn in, Clinton would, of course, be President until that moment in time as he would be anyway. But since he's only allowed to be elected to two four-year terms, he'd have to give up the Presidency and turn it over to Gore. Anything wrong with this logic? I'm not a consitutional scholar, so I'm soliciting opinions from the thread on this just for laughs. INTCfan