SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CAtechTrader who wrote (14133)11/10/2000 1:57:49 PM
From: Nick  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 65232
 
I am not for contesting the butterfly ballot or those 19000 ballots or the 3000 Buchanan votes. I think it is too late for that. And it also doesn't matter whether a DEM or REP designed the ballot.

I am concerned about the ballots that the machines might not be reading because they have not been punched all the way out. If after that recount, and of course the overseas ballots, Bush is the winner, then so be it.

But any attempts by Bush to thwart that count is nothing short of stealing the election.

For the good of the Nation, he should have PATIENCE, and let the process follow the course. What difference does it make if we wait until November 17, 2000, to declare the REAL winner?



To: CAtechTrader who wrote (14133)11/10/2000 2:05:25 PM
From: Cactus Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Fox News reporting and interviewing people in Little Haiti in Florida who claim that Democrats were IN the polling places in Little Haiti telling voters to vote straight Democrat and showing them where to mark their ballots. Many Haitian immigrants, including poll workers, claiming that they were effectively told which Democratic candidates for whom they had to cast their votes.

This gets uglier.