Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (116827)	11/10/2000 10:19:42 PM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Amy, Re: Florida law was violated because the ballot was drawn in a manner which is unlawful according to FL law. I don't know if this implies a revote will occur As I asked in another post to Scumbria, is this technicality ? As an outsider, I would say they are playing the word game here to find a way to void the result which IMO is very unfortunate. gary

To: Amy J who wrote (116827)	11/10/2000 10:33:44 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Florida law was violated because the ballot was drawn in a manner which is unlawful according to FL law" Amy, this has been shown to be a mis interpretation of the law. You have the link to the Florida law. Why is it that you can't read section 6? (6) Voting squares may be placed in front of or in back of the names of candidates leg.state.fl.us It is quite puzzling that people can have the link to the Florida law but somehow become blind when they read past section 2. Please take a moment and read it. EP

To: Amy J who wrote (116827)	11/10/2000 10:39:57 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Amy: I used your url and tracked it to 101.5609 Ballot Requirements, of Title IX, ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS Chapter 101 Voting Methods And Procedure (Elections Procedures Law of the State of Florida), it appears to be a correct representation of the Florida Law, and it seems to indicate that "butterfly" ballots are not "illegal" [for electronic ballots]: ...(6) Voting squares may be placed in front of or in back of the names of candidates and statements of questions and shall be of such size as is compatible with the type of system used. Ballots and ballot information shall be printed in a size and style of type as plain and clear as the ballot spaces reasonably permit. ... leg.state.fl.us "Fraud" is the intentional misrepresation of a material fact which induces reliance. The person who is accussed of fraud must have made the misrepresentation with scienter, which technically defined is general Bad-Nastiness. :))