Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (116886)	11/11/2000 8:03:07 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Amy, For those who would like to see Hillary win in a Presidential campaign, having Bush win could be useful. I disagree. Bush is planning on using the Reagan strategy of giving a huge across the board tax cut. This will make him very popular, because the impact on the deficit will not be generally understood till about 8 years later. It worked extremely well for Reagan/Bush, who got away with it for 11 years, until Ross Perot knocked some sense back into the voters minds in 1992. Scumbria

To: Amy J who wrote (116886)	11/11/2000 9:04:25 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 186894

Amy, <Is there something wrong with a "lady" being "ambitious?" Feel free to call her a "person" or simply "ambitious."> I don't have a problem with a "lady" being ambitious. But being a moderate, I just have a major problem with an ultra-liberal being ambitious. And that has nothing to do with the fact that she's a lady (despite the left's tendency to think that they have a monopoly on women's issues). But hey, I'm just a dumb guy, so what do I know? ;-) Tenchusatsu