Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (5509)	11/11/2000 11:21:10 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

We should believe baby Bush? I don't THINK so. He'll appoint judges that are, like himself, like Scalia, anti-choice. If you think any thing else, you are seriously out of touch. I suppose he could make a huge mistake evaluating a candidate, and appoint someone who suddenly became pro-choice after coming to the Supreme Court- but it is not likely. The whole POINT of winning an election is to shape policy and one way you do that is by shaping the judiciary by the judges you appoint. Gore, Bush, they will both have a whole host of issues that are litmus tests for court appointees- whether they admit it or not. People can SAY they don't have a litmus test. People can SAY anything they want. But it never makes what they say true. How you can believe your republican politician while decrying the lying of democratic politicians continues to amaze me. They ALL lie. If they weren't egomaniacs they wouldn't be tempted to run for office. They are all horrible- they all have agendas- and you have to pick the horrible person with the agenda closest to your own. But to make either side out to be "good" or "pure" is absolutely ridiculous.