SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (1729)11/11/2000 12:20:14 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
Sounds like it's a case of what goes around comes around. The only way to get this reviewed by the United States Supreme Court, perhaps years from now, unfortunately, is to present a federal question at the state level, and if you lose, appeal to the Supremes. Gee, I wonder what Rehnquist, Thomas, Scalia, O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter will think of this? -g-



To: TraderGreg who wrote (1729)11/11/2000 3:28:25 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
Help me out here please! How is the manual recount a 14th Amendment issue...?

If that sucker makes it to the Supreme Court, I'm going to keep a copy of the oral argument as a momento.

jttmab

P.S. A little left wing hyperbole showed up on another thread this morning; poster asserted that the Republicans are trying to destroy Democracy.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News