SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (116939)11/11/2000 11:35:29 AM
From: Gary Ng  Respond to of 186894
 
Winsock, Re: What happened to the R's "firm stand on principle" that use of the legal system was inappropriate and BAD for democracy ??

On this count, I don't buy GOP's logic, as disgusting as Democrat challenging the technicality of the ballot design.

gary



To: Windsock who wrote (116939)11/11/2000 11:41:58 AM
From: Diamond Jim  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
"It seems that the last thing the Bush campaign wants is a full, fair and accurate vote count -- if Bush is going to loose."

I guess you didn't listen to Baker's explanation as to why they don't want/trust a handcount.

tip:
wsu.edu



To: Windsock who wrote (116939)11/11/2000 11:53:44 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Winsock,
RE:"Jimbo - Stay Tooned !! The ride ain't over yet.
Election Vote Could Swing on Hand Tally Today"
FRAUD IS MUCH TO EASY WITH A HAND COUNT. A double punch here and punch out in a race where there was no vote and voila! The desired candidate wins! Especially, in counties heavily for one candidate.

I don't think Bush is scared of a true vote count, just having it STOLEN.

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News