Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Fleming who wrote (14508)	11/11/2000 11:59:38 AM
From: CAtechTrader	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 65232

Jim, we just disagree..no big deal...also the suit specifically is aimed at the constitutionality of the "standards" or lack thereof for conducting a hand recount, so the question is actually appropriate to the Federal Courts. You are decieving yourself if you think this would not end up in the US Supreme Court, it will no matter who files suit. Jim you do however seem to feel comfortable with any and all Democratic Party inspired appeals, suits etc. Aren't you ashamed of the DNC and Jesse Jackson inflaming all of these people to near riot over their own ignorance and failure? The Democrats seem to be saying "We stole this election fair and square, and now its not fair that we did not win." By the way, evidence is leaking out that many of the "double punched" ballots were "Bush" ballots, raising a whole other spectre of voter fraud...when did that 2nd punch occur? I support any attempt by Bush to defend himself against these tactics.