Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (60862)	11/11/2000 6:38:14 PM
From: Rarebird	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116764

<It would do you no harm to answer, though.> That is exactly how I feel about a recount by hand in Palm Beach county. Bush must be running scared shi#tless if he is getting court injunctions to prevent the process of Law from proceeding in the State of Florida.

To: long-gone who wrote (60862)	11/11/2000 7:49:27 PM
From: Rarebird	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116764

<It would do you no harm to answer, though.> Isn't it obvious that ignorance or confusion is no defense against the rule of Law? Ignorance is not bliss The Greeks understood that Knowledge is Virtue and I worship the Greeks. You know that.

To: long-gone who wrote (60862)	11/11/2000 10:05:54 PM
From: J.E.Currie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

Richard, And so I ask you Richard, as you seem fair-minded and one who accepts responsibility for one's actions. Had you been sent a Sample ballot (Section 203 of the Federal Voting Rights Act)as required, would you now be claiming the ballot which you used in the voting booth illegal? The time for that was when A. It was introduced by that Democrat, or, B. When you received the sample ballot. But most certainly not after you've voted. Very sissyfied that. je