SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave who wrote (8101)11/11/2000 2:40:59 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Not So Fast;

<On a cautious note, Verizon says that its Nov. 9 report doesn’t constitute “a final or
irrevocable commitment” to the technologies
that the company will use. Despite the apparent lack of commitment, Verizon’s Linskey
says, “Bottom line, we’ll be ready.”>

E911 Plans: Is That Your Final Answer?

By Allyson Vaughan

WASHINGTON—It’s the kind of tentative response that begs the likes of game show
host Regis Philbin to ask, “Is that your
final answer?”

When it comes to carriers’ enhanced 911 plans, the industry’s response is by no means
definitive, because carriers can choose
one solution and then change their plans if they later find a better technology. Still, faced
with the FCC’s deadline for answers,
carriers are identifying a variety of handset- and network-based solutions. Sprint PCS
chose a handset solution from Qualcomm,
while Verizon Wireless opted for a network solution. Cingular Wireless plans to deploy
both.

Industry experts have long debated the merits of network solutions vs. handset solutions
and the costs of deployment. For carriers,
such as Sprint PCS, that choose a handset solution, the FCC’s mandate says 67 percent
of handsets must be able to be traced
within 50 meters. Sprint PCS says it tested the GPS handset technology from
Qualcomm’s SnapTrack unit earlier this year, and it
was able to locate callers to within less than 30 meters–20 meters closer than the FCC
mandate.

Under the FCC mandate, carriers have until Oct. 1, 2001, to complete the second
phase of E911, which requires more precise
location data to be transferred with a call so dispatchers can trace a caller’s location
more easily.

Meanwhile, Verizon Wireless has opted for a network-based solution, but the carrier
still plans to evaluate handset solutions as
possible alternative location technologies. The network-based solution will require
upgrades at cell sites and switches, but no
upgrades are required for wireless handsets, which can be reconfigured with over-the-air
software programming. “Certainly, there
is the customer benefit of not having to change the handset in the near future,” says
Verizon spokeswoman Andrea Linskey.

While carriers appear committed to meeting the FCC mandate, it clearly is a challenge
because of the expense and complexity
involved with finding a suitable remedy. “All I know is we’re proceeding as fast as we
can,” says Andrew Clegg, manager of
strategic technology at Cingular Wireless. “I wish we had had more time. The
technologies have not had time to perfect
themselves.”

Verizon says “substantial work” still is needed for both network- and handset-based
solutions and that the timing will depend on
the deployment requests from public-safety answering points and the commercial
availability of the equipment, which will be
needed in large quantities.

On a cautious note, Verizon says that its Nov. 9 report doesn’t constitute “a final or
irrevocable commitment” to the technologies
that the company will use. Despite the apparent lack of commitment, Verizon’s Linskey
says, “Bottom line, we’ll be ready.”

In other words, the final answer still is waiting in the wings.



To: Dave who wrote (8101)11/11/2000 8:03:21 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
Dave. Does Snap Track provide more privacy than the network trangulation methods?? It seems like using the triangulation methods, network operators could determine your position even if you wanted to keep it secret.
JohnG