Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (70448)	11/11/2000 6:19:55 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

jhild: You need to understand that I do not find Gore to be much different than Bush in this regard. Except Bush is the one that makes such an issue of his moral authority. I happen to find this claim to be rather hypocritical. Gore at least did not make that a cornerstone of his claims to the people as to what he would bring to the office of the Presidency. It seems that you might be saying that George Bush should allow himself pummeled by the Democrat and Radical minions and perhaps die on the cross to be a good man. Others are allowed to scream and incite. Have you an opinion of Jesse Jackson? Have you an opinion of people with history of fraud, starting fire storms? I always thought that you had. With all that is being done for the sake of "the will of the people" by the Democrats and minions from every angle, you seem distraught that Bush won't take the high ground and fall on his sword for the sake his attackers. I think those days are over. Screaming and rioting or threats of violence and cries of injustice are absurd in this case. It seems if a Republican loses a leg, that is the cost of doing business, however, if a Democrat or radical gets a hangnail...the world needs to cover it. Sympathy should flow like tears at a funeral. IMO that sort of game play is old hat. regards :) TG