Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (117114)	11/11/2000 6:51:06 PM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, Re: Now, if this changing of the rules takes place in a totally pro-Gore county, and they don't extend this to all counties (looking at chads), etc., I'd take it to the Supreme Court. I read that Gore camp is proposing a state wide hand count ?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (117114)	11/11/2000 8:06:37 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

RE: " Bad news for Bush. ...they're saying that if 3 of 4 of the threads that hold the chad are out, or broken, the vote counts. In a very populous, high majority Gore county, Gore is bound to pick up >300 or so votes. ------------------------------------------- Hi Tony, Your prediction was correct: more bugs. Blocking a hand count will be an effective strategy to avoid the discovery of incorrectly counted ballots. I believe Bush, if he wants to win, must be be effective in blocking a hand count, otherwise, the votes that were meant for Gore would be discovered, thus, open for legal battle. By blocking a hand count this would prevent a legal battle, and could ensure Bush wins. I believe if Bush succeeds in blocking, he'll win. My opinion on all of this? There are a lot of bugs in this system - in both directions - take a look at my next post for yet another party that's to be blamed. Regards, Amy J