To: isopatch who wrote (78667 ) 11/11/2000 11:04:32 PM From: RWS Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453 Mr. Isopatch, Have you ever looked into who owns and controls the "liberal media" which you believe supports Gore? The media does not give a tinker's damn who is elected president, as long as they are on the winning side. But the billionaires who funded Gore and own the media do. The billionaires behind Bush are at a disadvantage because they are the right wing of the billionaires club and aren't, let's say uh, copacetic to the majority of the board of directors of USA, Inc. This is OXY vs HEC. Check the charts. (g) By the way none of these people are liberals for X sake. Bush continues to give the impression that he's trying to grab the crown and prevent a legal recount. If Bush were as concerned about recounting every county in Florida as so many on this thread are for the sake of "fairness," James Baker could simply request it. He has not, and IMHO will not, because it will probably turn up more uncounted votes for Gore than for Bush. Gore only needs to count enough votes that were cast for him to get a majority. Bush needs to prevent that. It is looking more and more like the vote in Florida went for Gore and that in various ways, it was not counted. Some big money didn't like that and they called Gore to tell him to retract the concession and contest the kangaroo count. There's nothing to do but watch. There is no way to influence this train of events because there is no alternative at this moment in history to the aptly described by SOB "two headed serpent" two party system. Look how keenly determined they were to squelch the populist campaign by Nader. The likes of Nader are a threat to their system. If something like Nader gets a head of steam you will really see some fireworks, shenanigans, and even a brouhaha. Hell there hasn't even been a lynching, house burning, or death threats. What's to get excited about. I hope you don't have a big investment in either of these jerks. (gg) Regards, RWS