Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (128317)	11/12/2000 3:46:04 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580142

Ted. ..Its not at all dangerous.....going after the truth never hurt anyone. Its when truth is denied that people get hurt. Its when the truth cannot be determined, that is when it becomes dangerous. Recounting in democratic districts until Al wins will not necessarily determine truth. Revoting PB will not determine the truth. Revoting all of Fla. or the country even will not determine the truth. Once again, if the difference in the vote totals is greater than the margin of error inherent in any type of vote counting, the actual truth will never be known. And no court system will correct that. And this process will end......there will be a level reached when most will know its done and it will be done. And how many skirmishes and wars have been fought before that level was reached. This is what Scumbria said It would be irresponsible not to fight to the bitter end. Does it really sound to you that he will stop before that level if he doesn't get what he wants. The truth to him sounds like "I intend to fight until I get my version of the truth." Unfortunately, someone has to take a stand on this issue and its better now than later. I disagree, someone will have to give up his stand to settle this. Then we need to modernize the voting system, so even Scumbria won't be able to dispute the outcome. Now that would be one helluva system.