Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (2098)	11/12/2000 10:23:17 PM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6710

Here's one place to start and a vote to boot. foxnews.com

To: KLP who wrote (2098)	11/12/2000 11:03:23 PM
From: Ronald D. Stange	Respond to of 6710

KLP: salon.com This link does not answer your question about how many ballots were actually trashed (whatever that means) but presumably 19K+ were invalated for over count with an additional 10K for under count not tabulated (a hypothetical, twice the number of 1996). Also on p.2, interesting statement about St. Louis voters putting their ballot in backwards which would be machine unreadable but vote was allowed during manual recount. (Wonder if that is possible in ballot holding devise in FL, and if so, will the vote be permitted in manual recount???) And on page 3, if true, interesting way of machine recounting in Columbia County, FL. <g>. Ron Moderate Independent