Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Habib who wrote (86745)	11/13/2000 11:41:35 AM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

" Dimples and pregnant are pretty rare. This is a tough standard. That's why it's quite fair. Also you can see why none of this would matter in all but the closest elections. It's an unfortunate confluence of events that the election may depend on a county that had a large statistical anomaly of overvotes due to confusion on a ballot and that that county used punch ballots." It is indeed. However, it seems odd that we'd only check the ballots in contested counties for dimples as opposed to all counties. As rare as they are, I'm guessing that it would wind up being a 50/50 split. SORRY to all who have continued to follow this thread. My feeling is the current woes of the market are directly related to the bizarre nature of the current election and therefore it is worthy of discussion on any stock thread....