SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (18936)11/13/2000 4:45:21 PM
From: 5dave22Respond to of 275872
 
Pravin, on strength I will reduce my stake in AMD. Now I just have to hope we can find strength at some point. Too many concerns.

Dave



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (18936)11/13/2000 5:00:44 PM
From: Charles RRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Pravin,

<It looks like my mobile Athlon concerns have been confirmed by AMD:

Mark Bode, a division marketing manager, said AMD also was still wrestling with heat concerns surrounding
the mobile chips. Desktop Athlons normally consume 60 watts, while a notebook chip needs to come in at 20
watts or less. >

These concerns are nothing new - laptops require lower power CPUs than desktops. Intel and AMD know how to take their fastest parts and run it at low voltages to meet the power number.

This power issue seems to be a fancy side step by Mark Bode to deflect the real issue - Palomino/infrastructure slip.

If power were THE reason, wouldn't you think Palomino desktop would be shipping now?

If you remember, the roadmap used to be Corvette mobile in H2. Then it became Palomino mobile in Q4. Then it became Palomino desktop in Q4 followed by Palomino laptop in Q1. Now it is Palomino desktop/laptop in Q1.

In parallel the ALI mobile chipset slipped from production in H2 to samples in Q4.

This is slip city. The marketing dance of justification is not surprising.

Chuck



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (18936)11/13/2000 5:22:52 PM
From: andreas_wonischRespond to of 275872
 
Pravin, Re: "Power is possibly the single biggest challenge," Bode said.

I wonder why power consumption is still a challenge when the CPUs are already sampling? Wouldn't it require a new stepping to decrease the consumption even further? I don't want to sound too negative but I find this statement from Bode very disturbing. I hope Q1 doesn't mean March.

Andreas



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (18936)11/13/2000 5:29:24 PM
From: Charles RRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Pravin,

I checked out the Gateway website see if there is anything there to support my thinking. Here is what I found:

gatewayatwork.com

The baseline $1299 small business system is now at 1GHz!

With this data, I would not be surprised if my guess turns out to be right. Gateway in fact may be sucking up a lot of the higher speed output. This also is consistent with the spike up of 1GHz Athlon prices (from Albert's post this morning)

We are probably days from introduction of 850/900Mhz Durons and/or 1.26/1.33GHz Thunderbird - probably coinciding with P4 announcement.

Chuck



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (18936)11/15/2000 2:21:46 AM
From: Paul EngelRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: "Power is possibly the single biggest challenge," Bode said. ..Mark Bode, a division marketing manager, said AMD also was still wrestling with heat concerns surrounding
the mobile chips. Desktop Athlons normally consume 60 watts, while a notebook chip needs to come in at 20
watts or less"

Hmmmm.....wasn't the MuSKANK core supposed to lower the power - or Palomino - or one of the many "GELDINGS" that are "in the labs" at AMD ?