Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (74043)	11/14/2000 12:16:33 PM
From: Dave Gore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

LONG, well certainly your feelings are much more accurate than the states who researched it thoroughly and put the manual recount into law. My goodness! LOL!

To: SecularBull who wrote (74043)	11/14/2000 12:20:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

a human, subjective element You neglect a machine subjective element. If the cards are fed through a machine left to right then chad clinging by the right two perfs would close back into the hole while chad clinging to the left two perfs may be dislodged by the card reader. Such a situation would be obvious to the human but the chad would repeatably close over the hole in machine recounts. There are many other ways to fool the machines. If the chad were punched out by machine there would be less variation in the chad, and a machine count would be more accurate. TP