What's really going on? Disclaimer: Everything below is opinion only. It is made up ramblings of a senile old man. It is all fiction for entertainment purposes only. There is something way more insidious going on in this story if you understand Biblical prophecy. If you don't believe in the Bible, keep watching and perhaps pick up a few books by current accepted authorities on end-time prophecy -- not the nuts, but legitimate, intelligent people. I encourage you not to summarily dismiss it as fables and fairy tales until you lay the current world map of events over the Biblical predictions written so long before technology and certain peoples even existed. This requires great thought, and I don't expect a Palm Beach Democrat to be interested.
First, check out these links. Quite humorous indeed.
hometown.aol.com
sightings.com
A very intelligent friend of mine pointed out the following:
Consider what we are seeing: the most-free nation on earth setting itself up to be taken over by bureaucrats like those running the European Union with little political oversight -- so all will one day soon be in place for the last switch to be thrown, and total control of the economy given over to the control of a world government (SOROS' hint here about Biblical Roman Empire). (You see how IRS discovered how to uncover all credit cards linked to accounts in the Caymans, etc. Practice makes perfect.)
Of course Gore and his henchmen have to rid us of the inconvenience of the Constitution.
These people, honest to God, believe we are their cattle, and they are in charge of our lives.
Gore is like Pol Pot. Remember him? Piled up the skulls of millions of his fellow Cambodians merely so he could "simplify" society. Drove them from their homes into the jungles. Gore will end up doing same if he can get us to close down our "polluting" industries, get rid of our cars (and consequent freedom of movement), and in general drop our standard of living. Such a drop will cause a steep rise in deaths due to disease, poor distribution of resources, etc.
It's the same way that Stalin killed off the "kulak" class of land-owning peasants. He did it in the name of "the masses" -- in our case it will be "the minorities" that Jesse Jackson is striving so hard to create and control. He is a vicious, lying heretic.
This is the revenge, I think, of the Old South. Through the Democrat control of teacher unions and civil service unions, they have seen to the raising of new generations of fatherless, socially dependent, untaught, poorly-educated blacks as a perpetual mob of the "poor" in whose name they can seize power. (How does their product differ from that of slave days when black men were encouraged to breed children they would never see?) Old Democrats will destroy Yankee power (the army that put them under, 135 years ago). This explains Clinton-Gore drive to destroy the military -- SOROS' LINK to article now:
Subject: Navy's Honor at Risk
>>
>> By Geoff Metcalf + 2000 WorldNetDaily.com Story:
>>
>> President Clinton reportedly plans to visit China and Vietnam before the end of his term. According to high-ranking Navy officers, the Commander in Chief will alter long-standing Naval regulations to allow the American flag to fly below that of Vietnam when he sails into the communist nation's territorial waters on a U.S. Navy ship. (Jack's note...A US Navy Ship is sovereign U.S. territory and the American flag is never subordinate!)
Highly placed Navy sources who spoke on condition of anonymity believe this action on the president's part would further devastate already tenuous Navy morale. As part of his swan song, Clinton reportedly intends to visit
two ports aboard Naval vessels. Trip one takes him to the People's Republic of China, which has a regulation that no war ship of any country may enter its territorial waters flying a flag higher than that of the People's Republic of China. According to one Navy source, China and the U.S. have effected a compromise whereby both flags-the U.S. and the PRC-will be flown from U.S. naval vessels at the same height. But visceral outrage is resulting from a proposed change to Navy regulations that would result in the American
flag being displayed subordinate to the flag of Vietnam. Navy regulations and tradition prescribe that no country's flag will be displayed in a superior position to the U.S. flag. However, Vietnam's rules reportedly demand that the Vietnamese flag shall always fly in a superior position to any other country's flag.
High-ranking naval officers, speaking on condition that their names not be published, say the reason for all the alarm, anger and career-threatening rhetoric is that Clinton allegedly has either ordered, or is about to order, the secretary of the Navy to amend regulations to permit the Vietnamese flag to be displayed over the U.S. flag.
"I'd like to blow the @#&*% thing up!" said one frustrated officer. The United States Navy Regulations began with the enactment by the Continental Congress of the "Rules for the Regulation of the Navy of the United Colonies" on Nov. 28, 1775. So a long and proud history bolsters the long-held Navy tradition that no country's flag will fly higher than that of the United States.
Commenting on the report, Col. David Hackworth, America's most decorated living war veteran, said, "What's new? Clinton has done everything else to dishonor the flag, why not make it number two?" He added, "Congress ought to pull this traitor's travel plug ... now."
Calls to the Navy Staff Operations and Special Events office were referred to the Public Affairs Office, which then referred WND to the news desk. When WND outlined the scenario, the spokesman-whose first comment was, "Wow" - later called back to say, "We haven't been able to find anything on it yet, but we're trying to run the story to ground." Adm. Thomas B. Fargo, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, reportedly has visited the People's Republic of China recently also, although the reason for the trip is not known.
NOTE: Some of you may wonder what the fuss is about, but please remember that the Navy prides itself on honor and tradition. The Naval Officers are not being "childish and petty" when they speak out against this. Morale is at an all-time low, and military commands do not need to once again be berated for their job. How does this "slap in the face" decision fall under the power(s) of the Commander in Chief?
It reminds me of when Hillary ordered that uniforms not be worn by the White House in-house Marines. This order still stands, if you visit the White House today, 8 years later. What used to be a sought-after, privileged job, is now seen as a tour of punishment by these young Marines who stand around in civilian clothes. They not only lost their uniform but their self-esteem to be seen in the uniform they are asked to defend. How much more can the people that are asked to defend our freedom take? The crews on the Navy ships leave their families and loved ones behind more than 6 months at a time. Everything possible should be done to praise and encourage them for their dedication!
Clinton will enjoy his boat ride for a few hours and never look back to see the eyes of the men and women who serve our country. Just as the Clinton Administration will never look back at the damage that has been done to our Military and to this Nation.
Please forward this information to your E-Mail list.. It is being blocked by all major news media. (Would this surprise anyone????)
Ron Brassard Air Force Program Manager
For fun, look up the meaning of the word "gore."
My Dictionary gives only one meaning for the word "gore" beyond its original meaning, which was simply "dung or dirt."
The current standard dictionary meaning of "gore" is "blood that is shed." Again, many prophetic meanings can be read into this, but, I leave that to the studied few. If someone really understands what's going on in the good ol' USA right now and how it is coming to a head after many years of planning, I'd love to discuss it, but perhaps take it to my Prophecy thread (search "prophecy"). Adios, farewell, adieu, so long.
I remain,
SOROS |
