Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stoctrash who wrote (16691)	11/15/2000 10:06:37 PM
From: stomper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

LOL, dude, there is no such thing as a fair deal. eom -dave

To: Stoctrash who wrote (16691)	11/16/2000 1:58:36 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 65232

Get a life. Her decision was based on advice of counsel, and appears to have a solid basis in the law. She has the discretion to refuse to count late votes and from what I've seen, there has been no cogent reason from the counties why they didn't get the count done by the deadline. Why West Palm Beach waited until the day after the statutory deadline to even begin a count is beyond me. Volusia County did it right. They started their count and got it done, and I belive the Secretary of State is counting the votes from that hand count. A challenge based on abuse of discretion is a hard one to make. The only way the counties win this one is if the state Supreme Court is stacked with democrat judges. BTW, did you get your resume in for a position on Hillary's staff?