Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: quasar_1 who wrote (6292)	11/16/2000 12:13:29 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

Re: "It doesn't matter what follows it." Of course it does, clearly, that is CENTRAL to the question "what would result?" Re: "It is not a comment on what political institution, if any, exists after the armed insurrection." Was not the question essentially, "what results from.." If so, your question indeed implied a question of what comes AFTER, for all living through such an event- at least that was my interpretation. It seems you wished to describe only the battle itself. One more, Re: "The American Revolutionaries would never have overthrown the King of England in England." Probably not, but we'll, we'll never know. They were pretty fed up in England, and if they didn't have a place to risk there lives to run off to.... ??? Substantial basic agreement here, all in all, none-the-less. I was just wanting to point out that an armed insurrection might result in something better indeed, not necessarily anarchy at all. At least, it's within the realm of possibilities. Dan B