Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JungleInvestor who wrote (79402)	11/17/2000 11:52:28 PM
From: JungleInvestor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

OT: <<In one piece of welcome news for Gore, Broward officials announced they would use a more expansive standard in evaluating whether voters meant to mark their ballots for one candidate or another. They will begin counting indentations by candidate names, not just fully or partially punched boxes. The change could increase the overall number of votes counted, a majority of which are expected to go for Gore, based on the overall election results. >> washingtonpost.com I fervently hope that Bush goes to the US Supreme Court. The election process has degraded into a mockery. Gore's deplorable tactics are so brazen. They've selected counties that are overwhelmingly Democratic, and "convinced" the Democratic canvassing Boards in these counties to do a manual recount with a "standard" that is obviously meant to add votes for Gore where there are no votes. Why isn't there a public outcry?