Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (6533)	11/18/2000 1:04:14 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

>The individual freedoms needing protecting are clearly laid out, along with the attendant responsibility to do no harm, in our Constitution. The right to seek happiness is critical, and the recognition of this allows each individual indeed to "pick the freedom(endeavor) he likes and call that freedom." Such protected choices for individuals are not necessarily, nor even likely, to be arbitrary.< There is no "right" to seek happiness in the Constitution. I think you've muddled up the declaration of independence with the Constitution. You might want to read both before you decide to pontificate. Further, if you knew anything about Con law you would know that different constitutional scholars can come to diametrically opposed opinions on the same issue- it all depends on what view you start out with and where you want to end up. Law, and people are arbitrary and capricious. So it has been and so it will always be.