Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColtonGang who wrote (6551)	11/18/2000 9:27:43 AM
From: Frank Griffin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

CG, this is a very serious matter. Half the people in the US will not accept a rigged and stolen election. There will be resentment that will reach yet unknown levels. It is so wrong to manipulate and/or steal an election. Gore has shown that he and his supporters will go to any length to manipulate or steal the result of this election. This will be a very difficult wound to heal. I don't think Gore can effectively govern. His administration will be tainted and will not have the support of at least half the people.

To: ColtonGang who wrote (6551)	11/18/2000 2:26:46 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

No, If the Fla. court allows Gore to succeed in his quest to include his chosen territories alone, and he "wins" on that basis, and Federal courts won't overturn, and Gore still calls that "fair" and refuses to concede, Secretary Harris would certify as it stands now for Bush, guaranteed. Presuming Gore refused to concede and sends his electors to vote along with Bush's electors, even the Supreme Court cannot prevent Congress from being the final arbiter as to who gets to vote, if then necessary. Where there is disagreement over which candidate's electors go to vote, Congress decides. Dan B