Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (38839)	11/18/2000 4:26:31 PM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Evidence of nothing other than sloppy county property control...not vote fraud. In a courtroom you'd get smoked. (I predict in a few months you can have all the Votomatic machines you want.) If you're not aware there is a chain of possession ballots go through as well. This involves signatures from the people who transport and accept the ballot (cards) as they are moved through the collection and counting process. Sometimes it can involve the recording of serial numbers from the ballot boxes/bags they came out of and a sequential count and recording of the ballot sleeves themselves. Seal and locks can only be broken in front of witnesses within the confines of certain offices. Depending on where you're located, it all can get very complicated (so I've come to learn from first hand experience.) Following the chain of posession and control and cross referencing that with internal audit numbers is where you'd find evidence of vote fraud. Not in the back of some joker's car or on E Bay.