Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (128866)	11/20/2000 1:53:32 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570331

RE: "Not true" ------------- Jim, Go back and read my post. Your post has nothing to do with the topic we were discussing, so when you say "not true", it doesn't apply. Message 14844526 We were discussing absentee ballots, to which my absentee form in a prior election was not qualifying due to the strict anti-fraud requirements that make it so difficult for honest absentee voters to vote. So, I was agreeing with Greg that the disqualification of absentee voters is a shame, because their intent was to vote, just as it was mine. It appears you incorrectly jumped into the middle of a post, truncated my post, and then incorrectly assumed "these ballots" did not refer to "absentee ballots" even though it did, as that was our topic. How many times do I have to say this today: please read the entire post? I'm losing interest in posting, when these types of reading errors become a pattern. I'd rather debate at a higher level. Btw, the Dem (specifically, Lieberman) has openly stated he and the Dem Party would like the absentee ballots to be included in the count because they believe every vote should count. The article is on CNN. Regards, Amy J