Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (18233)	11/20/2000 6:58:48 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

<<I am amazed that our presidency is going to be won because 1900 ballots were given to gore, because a panel of democrats decided it was the intent of that voter to vote for their candidate.>> If what you say is true things will be appealed all the way to the US Supreme Court. I don't think the random standards that are being utilized for the 'hand re-count' will be allowed. Just my view. Best Regards, Scott

To: im a survivor who wrote (18233)	11/20/2000 7:00:53 PM
From: Dalin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

Hi KG4! I have an idea! I think if we get the right lawyers involved, we can show our true intent was to get out of this market, March 1st.<g> The rules of the game need to be changed. Its not fair. The arrows were not pointing, clearly, in the direction the market was going. And the brokers....those margin call folks, well, they have been completely biased! Just because some folks have more money in their accounts compared to others? That completely disinfranchises us low income investors. This could go to the US Supreme Court! :0) D.