SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carl R. who wrote (83009)11/20/2000 10:09:36 PM
From: TheLineMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I don't this so. I think deep inside they know this can only be resolved at this level by ordering a statewide handcount - otherwise there are plenty of constitutional issues which would go to the US supreme court.
I think they want to resolve this within the legal framework of the Florida statutes and prevent this. Can they - I don't know enough about the laws?



To: Carl R. who wrote (83009)11/20/2000 10:14:23 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 769670
 
not impressed with the Florida Supreme Court.
I only saw the edited version on the Leher News Hour. Your wife isn't chained close enough to the stove I guess. Those judges were sharp and inquisitive. They asked Devil's Advocate questions to each side to ascertain the underlying asumptions. That was probably too subtle for your wife. They seemed most interested in how the Florida Laws matched with federal regulations and how much power they would have to assume to rule in various ways.

If you want to see political hacks you should listen to the Texas Supreme Court where all the judges are elected and have to choose which lawyer will pay for their next campaign.
TP



To: Carl R. who wrote (83009)11/20/2000 11:22:04 PM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769670
 
Complete transcript of the hearing today..
foxnews.com



To: Carl R. who wrote (83009)11/21/2000 1:50:49 AM
From: DOUG H  Respond to of 769670
 
In fact she said that there really wasn't a lot of discussion of the actual legal issues. According to her the Democratic argument seemed to hinge around what was "fair" and they totally ignored the legal issues, which is not surprising I suppose since the law clearly supports the Republican position.

I heard some of them were overheard humming John Lennon's "Imagine". I call em Utopia-crats.