Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary105 who wrote (1687)	11/21/2000 1:27:06 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 3887

also expect Gore, if he is not gaining significantly in recount, to appeal based on technicalities. I Appeal where? Palm Beach Municipal Court? This IS the Fla Sup Ct. He has already "won" the Federal District Court Case on the basis of "no federal jurisdiction", I think. There is as much chance as his appealing to the US Supreme Court as there would be appealing an anti-trust case directly to the USSC without going to the Federal Court of Appeal first. Uh, whoops. :)))

To: Gary105 who wrote (1687)	11/21/2000 7:52:11 AM
From: kha vu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

<<<if he is not gaining significantly in recount,>>> unfortunately, here is the latest news: home-news.excite.com <<<Gore's Mistaken Ballots Growing Updated: Tue, Nov 21 01:37 AM EST By DAVID ROYSE, Associated Press Writer TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) - As workers go back over ballots that weren't counted on Election Night, sorting them by hand into "possibly for Gore" and "possibly for Bush" piles, Gore's stacks are growing faster. And - the Supreme Court permitting - they are the stacks that could decide the election. There were about 27,000 of these "undervotes" in three South Florida counties, ballots on which no vote for president was registered by machines the first time around. Some experts on voter behavior say the undervoted ballots with their "dimples" or "hanging chads" are found more in Democratic areas. The reasons are tough to pinpoint, but experts speculate more Democratic voters would be inexperienced or advanced in age. "Republicans are just better trained voters, it's just one of these quirks," said Dario Moreno, a political science professor at Florida International University in Miami. ....>>>