Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Constant Reader who wrote (83564)	11/21/2000 2:39:57 PM
From: Mr. Whist	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

If hand recounts are not as inaccurate as machine counts, then why did D-Dubya-I sign into law a bill allowing such? Was D-Dubya-I bamboozled? Or misled by Democrats? Or did he sign the legislation without reading it because he had a football game to watch? Re: pregnant chads: They're only counted when there's one pregnant chad per presidential candidate. If there are two, or none, of four, then the ballot is tossed. This ain't rocket science we're dealing with here.

To: Constant Reader who wrote (83564)	11/21/2000 2:40:26 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Regarding pregnant chads, if they are counted as votes, then all of the state's ballots must be retabulated by hand to see if there are any pregnant chads on ballots with holes punched. Such ballots would need to be recognized as multiple vote ballots and would need to be thrown out.