Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (83693)	11/21/2000 4:19:32 PM
From: Trio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I agree on the CYA point. I don't agree on the SoS. People can and do argue over what would have happened "if" one official did or didn't do this or that (was that clear <g>). There have always been corrupt "officals" and there always will be regardless of party affiliation. Each side files whatever in order to be proactive. Bush blew it b/c he didn't ask for recounts within the 72 hour period. He can't cry foul now. My point to the Gore side is that they willingly stopped counting knowing the appeal process was continuing, so don't cry foul now either. I truly hope the S-court rules according to law. I couldn't believe my ears yesterday when I heard someone state there was a "100% chance the corrupt court would rule in favor of Mr. Gore." I don't know what the "law" truly says but I do know it was out of bounds for a justice to ask about what Texas law says. Their task is not to discern other states but Florida alone - that question harmed the credibility of the justice and also suggested they haven't been doing their homework to be prepared. Sorry for the length. TRIO