Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Konrad who wrote (41902)	11/22/2000 8:52:41 AM
From: maverick61	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

OT> Mark, another very well reasoned and excellent post. This incresing judicial activism has become a great concern for our country overall. The judiciary branch was set up to uphold the laws of our country, not to overturn existing ones and rewrite new ones. that is what this decision did, and continues a very disturbing trend of activist judges legislating from the bench. Its time for the country to strike back at this increasing judicial activism and get the judiciary back doing what our founding fathers intended

To: Mark Konrad who wrote (41902)	11/22/2000 9:18:18 AM
From: KevinThompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

Whether one agrees with a particular judgment or not, credit goes to the Democrats for understanding, using, and aggressively increasing the power of the judicial process over the years. Occasionally, as with Justice Rose Bird here in California, a judge can become so adverse to existing law that the "will of people" eventually prevails to the point where the judge is forcibly removed. Judges are not Popes(!) and they certainly aren't gods. One name: Janet Reno. Hmm, where did she originally come from? Oh ya, Florida. KT