SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (118856)11/22/2000 10:44:50 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jim,

re: "Since your wife is a Lawyer you should know that the first one to hire a Lawyer set the whole process in motion."

They all had lawyers. It could be argued the first one to use a lawyer, that is to file a suit, "set the whole process in motion". That would be Bush. But if it hadn't been Bush, it would have been Gore soon after.

They are both to blame for this mess.

John



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (118856)11/22/2000 11:07:25 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Intel is holding up quite well on this black day for the rule of law.

EP



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (118856)11/22/2000 11:21:14 AM
From: f.simons  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Since your wife is a Lawyer you should know that the first one to hire a Lawyer set the whole process in motion.

Jim

Everyone on these threads seems to believe in the "Rule of Law" and that the other side is attempting to subvert it, mostly by using hordes of lawyers. People of good will disagree on just what the ROL is, and we have set up court systems across the nation to mediate those disagreements. We use people called jurors, judges and lawyers to run that system.
Instead of your constant complaining about lawyers, maybe you could let us know just how you would go about mediating differences about the meaning of the "Rule of Law" short of electing you Dictator.

Frank