Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (84911)	11/22/2000 12:27:24 PM
From: BishopsChild	Respond to of 769670

and the court chose not to write law from the bench by imposing a uniform standard. where they not writting law by placing a deadline...????

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (84911)	11/22/2000 12:28:31 PM
From: md1derful	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

Nadine..fair enough...I'd be willing to suspect that most of us would have agreed to hand counting, in the name of fairness if the standards were set uniformly BEFORE THE ELECTION...remember too, that when you refer to the court...you must realize that it is VERY liberal...and this is seen quite clearly in the particulars of their decision imho...I'm not saying the court is necessarily political but it speaks with a pronounced liberal bias and the result just flowed naturally...and again, in regards to "local standards"....these seem subject to the will of Democratically controlled boards, which is unfortunate in such a close election...this alone lends and air of unfairness no matter who you voted for, I would argue doc