Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (2229)	11/25/2000 5:12:18 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 3887

I congratulate you on your amazing and patient response to Art. It takes a lot of grit, IMO to make such a reasoned and rational response to someone who is obviously never going to take it to heart. Nice try though.

To: lml who wrote (2229)	11/26/2000 12:55:38 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3887

I disagree entirely that Art's post was "extremely partisan." He stated the situation in a nutshell: So now we have the Bush people saying, "don't verify the military absentee ballots; count all of them." My, my, how interesting, considering that they also say, "don't count any more ballots in Dade County." It's the same ole double standard. Yet again. Do not misunderstand this to be a partisan argument. It is an argument for common sense equality and fairness. Your statement:To except a dimpled chad as evidence of voter intent is utterly ridiculous Ignores the fact that it is not ridiculous and is done quite often throughout the country. Regardless of any preference in this particular election, it is not the humanly impossible or extremely unusual process the Republicans are trying to paint it to be.