Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RON BL who wrote (87694)	11/25/2000 11:35:05 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

>>>You have no precedence to show that are favorable while what I posted earlier is a clear precedence in favor of Bush and from a higher court than the state court<<<< It is my belief that the main thing they have to consider is whether the Florida Supreme court was correct when they interrupted the state law regarding whether Harris was bound by the word "must" or whether she should have used better judgement by looking at the part of the law that said "may" in regards the results being in by monday. They said that under the circumstances and considering the amount of votes to be counted and everything that she was wrong when she said she had no other choice. Therefore the recount was allowed to continue. I agree with the Florida supreme court and I think the US Court will too. The Justices would not be human if they didn't have in the backs of their minds some of the other pertinent events that have happened in Florida that have cost Gore the election. Everyone knows that Gore would have won Florida by upwards of 10 or 20,000 votes except for the wacky ballot in Palm Beach and the intimidation in Dade among other things. I don't think they will mention it but I think they know these facts and will consider them even if subconsciously. PS>>>> Of course I've heard of Roe vs Wade, you mixed me up when you said Roe vs Alabama.