Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (89570)	11/27/2000 2:59:52 AM
From: $Mogul	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Good bye Lemming Longs... According to Bob Novak, Greenspan, who may be secretly rooting for Gore, is maintaining his tightening bias: suntimes.com A secret supporter for Gore November 23, 2000 BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST Alan Greenspan, the revered chairman of the Federal Reserve Board who once was a highly partisan Republican, takes the non-political nature of his office seriously enough not to choose sides in the presidential long count. But serious Fed watchers believe he is secretly rooting for Al Gore against George W. Bush--a preference with deep implications for the economy. The warmth of Greenspan's eight-year partnership with the Clinton administration is matched by his frosty relationship with the Bush family. The next president will name four of the Federal Reserve's seven governors, and a Bush-appointed board imperils Greenspan's mastery. All the more reason, then, that Greenspan finessed last week's meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee. Citing dubious inflationary pressures, the central bank's policymaking body maintained its "bias" for tightening money when capital markets actually need lower interest rates. But Wall Street whispered that Greenspan was behind the curve. Greenspan proved so politically maladroit as an economic adviser in Richard M. Nixon's 1968 presidential campaign that he was barred from halls of power until Nixon fell and he became chairman of President Gerald Ford's Council of Economic Advisers. Over three decades, Greenspan has become a political grandmaster who first was appointed Fed chairman by Ronald Reagan and named to a fourth term by Bill Clinton. He has few critics and hardly any enemies. With one big exception. High officials in President George Bush's administration still rage that Clinton was elected in 1992 because of Greenspan's tight money policy at the Fed. Intended or otherwise, revenge could be exercised by the son. Even though George W. Bush's economic adviser Lawrence Lindsey is Greenspan's friend and former colleague at the Fed, the new Republican president would be likely to name four new governors at the central bank not nearly so docile as Greenspan's current associates. Greenspan remembers how he attained power 13 years ago. In 1986, Paul Volcker's prestige as Fed chairman then approached Greenspan's today, but not his control over the Board of Governors. In 1986, a largely Reagan-appointed board secretly outvoted Volcker, a Jimmy Carter appointee, 4-3, to lower interest rates. Volcker's authority was shredded, and Reagan replaced him with Greenspan in 1987. Greenspan does not relish a similar undermining. Given how critical the Gore-Bush recount may be to his future, Greenspan is sitting tight with Fed policy. But even his admirers raise eyebrows over the FOMC's justification for keeping its anti-inflation bias because "the increase of energy prices still harbors the possibility of raising inflation expectations." No serious economist believes that, particularly with a likely drop in oil prices ahead. For the last month, the sickly corporate bond market has signaled to financiers the prospect of a painful recession instead of the comfortable diminished growth sought by Greenspan's tightened money. The FOMC's puzzling talk about inflationary expectations only deepened the gloom on Wall Street. The growing consensus is that the economy cries out for new capital formation, and that requires help on both monetary and fiscal fronts. In monetary policy, an interest rate cut is needed from the Fed. In fiscal policy, the relatively small tax cut package containing important pension reforms is needed from Congress beginning Dec. 5 rather than waiting for the uncertainty of the 2001 session. Few dare utter the word, but the economy's worsening problem is deflation. In late 1996, supply-side advocate Jude Wanniski wrote his then friend Greenspan to congratulate him on his marriage and to wryly express the hope that the falling price of gold signaling a coming deflation would not spoil his honeymoon. The current deflationary gold price is $265 an ounce, representing a $35 drop since Jan. 1, 2000. That promises to be more dangerous for the country than threats by future Fed governors to the chairman's domination or a phantom oil inflation.