Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (89847)	11/27/2000 11:12:24 AM
From: Constant Reader	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Speaking of hypocrisy: Some of us are wondering how you reconcile your strong environmentalist stance with your choice of residence? Meeting the water needs of residents of Southern California has caused extensive irreparable damage to the Colorado River, Owens Valley, and much of Northern California.

To: American Spirit who wrote (89847)	11/27/2000 11:13:40 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

No "dimples" are legally counted in Texas under Texas law. Where do these myths come from?

To: American Spirit who wrote (89847)	11/27/2000 11:15:15 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769667

First, you ignore the thrust of the piece, which is that you are wrong in asserting that the practice is widespread. Then, you focus on the possibility of using dimpled chads in Texas, without considering the constraints. It is unusual and controversial, even in the Texas context........

To: American Spirit who wrote (89847)	11/27/2000 11:35:13 AM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 769667

To PartyTime, Nichols, flapjack or you, A.S. Why wont anyone answer this simple premise: How can you justify using one Florida law (right to recount in up to 4 counties within 72 hours) and not another (recount must be done within a week)? I realize that completing the recount in 1 week is a tough chore, but it is a BIG advantage to be able to cherry pick where you want the recounts. Please justify why you (and Gore) think one of the laws is fine, but the other is no good. It is very strange to hear you guys (or gals) rail about how GWB stole this election. How do you justify your position against the info stated above?

To: American Spirit who wrote (89847)	11/27/2000 11:35:57 AM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

To PartyTime, Nichols, flapjack or you, A.S. Why wont anyone answer this simple premise: How can you justify using one Florida law (right to recount in up to 4 counties within 72 hours) and not another (recount must be done within a week)? I realize that completing the recount in 1 week is a tough chore, but it is a BIG advantage to be able to cherry pick where you want the recounts. Please justify why you (and Gore) think one of the laws is fine, but the other is no good. It is very strange to hear you guys (or gals) rail about how GWB stole this election. How do you justify your position against the info stated above?