SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Trickle Portfolio -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tuck who wrote (151)11/27/2000 12:08:37 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1784
 
I don't give a damn what you put into it and what you don't. As I had originally configured the old "trickle" portfolio, it was reagents/instruments/ilk.



To: tuck who wrote (151)11/27/2000 12:22:23 PM
From: keokalani'nui  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1784
 
Tuck, I agree that the companies for whom a drug discovery effort (by royalty or ownership) could result in a valuation 'lump' independent of the trickle valuation should be excluded from the watch list. Companies like ILEX and the mighty-mice companies are a good examples.

I am not pushing MCLS for a buy, but the watchlist seems appropriate (especially if the watchlist is as much a trickle-index as it is a corral) since from what I can tell MCLS has an entirely "work for hire" model, complete with so-so margins and steady if modest sales increases. (They don't even have a stalking horse drug candidate to pin future financings on!) Anyway, JMO.

Thank you for this thread, by the way.

Wilder