Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (91792)	11/28/2000 2:00:25 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

There goes MY Christmas list.....

To: Neocon who wrote (91792)	11/28/2000 2:00:54 PM
From: C Nelson Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Neocon, re: >>In addition, the constitutional right to bear arms contemplates carryable weaponry, and not cannonade.<< Can I have a bazooka or not? C Nelson

To: Neocon who wrote (91792)	11/28/2000 2:17:19 PM
From: Enam Luf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"the constitutional right to bear arms contemplates carryable weaponry, and not cannonade." I was not aware that the constitution addresses this issue... where? or is that an interpretation by our courts? The key word there is overburdensome. I would say that within the leeway of that grey area lies the battleground. I do not think that background checks and waiting periods are overburdensome, especially in cities. I would be interested in how someone could argue that they are and still be within the spirit of the constitutional right. BTW I have used a beautiful Baretta Shotgun to shoot skeet. It was fun :) As far as the nuclear weapon argument goes, I was simply pointing out that the words right to bear arms are not absolute.