Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (2819)	11/28/2000 4:52:15 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3887

That's one of the most bogus and vile posts I've seen here on SI. And you "grow tired of" my "tone?" You really take the cake. You initially contacted me via pm a week or so ago basically complimentary but accompanied with your 'direction' in what I 'should' discuss as well as your statement that you didn't wish to have an exchange. So why did you pm me in the first place? After receiving a second pm from you, I put you on PM Ignore status. And you've been jumping all over me ever since with your ill manner. Get over the fact that I am not your lemming. And now you post to me with just any ole ugly thing you can think to fabricate. Plus these: > I can't wait to see your evidence. I give you 'till December 12th. I suggest you chill a bit. If you can't back up your words here, then I suggest you refrain from making unsubstantiated allegations. So, to throw back to me my own "question," or more appropriately my CHALLENGE to you, is no excuse for your unsubstantiated defense of chad ballots. < [I said they were used. That's a "defense???"] > You don't cite your sources < Here's the link to what was already posted here on this thread: Message 14872696 If you bother to read the post this time, read the articles from the links this time. Does that unwad your panties?

To: lml who wrote (2819)	11/28/2000 5:11:23 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3887

Give it up, lml. Anyway, it's over. It is SO over. Don't suppose you caught the Florida Legislature's special committee meeting on C-Span today? They are getting ready to pick Florida's Electors themselves. ____________________________________________ 3 U.S.C. § 2 - Failure to make choice on prescribed day. Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct. _____________________________________________