SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (92419)11/28/2000 5:09:19 PM
From: lawdog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
But that would mean that Bush would stand a good chance of losing. Fair is no good for Bush if it might lead to his loss.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (92419)11/28/2000 5:09:23 PM
From: Norm Demers  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Then why doesn't he accept it already ?



To: TigerPaw who wrote (92419)11/28/2000 5:11:13 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Respond to of 769670
 
You believe wrong. Sorry, but it won't happen. It's against the law.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (92419)11/28/2000 5:14:47 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 769670
 
Too late. The ballots have already been manipulated too much. JLA



To: TigerPaw who wrote (92419)11/28/2000 5:15:55 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I believe it's reasonable too...but I KNOW Gore has had numerous chances to ask for such, and he's consistently, greedily, and officially asked only for his own territory. Even now, he asks again only for his own Territory. It never was necessary to have Bush agree to hand-counts everywhere, all Gore had to do was ask himself. The public is getting sick of his poopy in this regard. ME too. Had he sought fairness in the start, he'd likely have gotten what you want done. Now the election is certified, and all I see is a loser continuing to ask only for unfair advantages from the system.

Dan B