Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl R. who wrote (211)	11/28/2000 10:29:14 PM
From: Bosco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 644

Hi Carl - from the articles I ve been sharing with you, Sec Baker was more than a figurehead. However, we can have our own level of skepticism. Again, I ve no idea about Sec Christopher, so I cannot help you there. I certainly cannot dictate other people's sensibility. Maybe there are people who still believe in VP Gore. However Rev Al is quite a character, I remember a news report of him trying to hook up with President Clinton [then candidate Clinton] in the street of NYC. The news report painted a comic picture in which President Clinton was trying to run the other way, you know, like those slapstick comedy :). In terms of the Miami-Dade County situation, again, I ve found the article written by a Miami Herald writer hilarious. In retrospect, maybe I ve forced my sensibility on to others. Who knows, maybe Mr Gigot really believes in what he has written. If I ve offended anyone, my apology. Anyway, my guess is that people tend to make up their minds based on their version of truth, so maybe we can leave it as that. best, Bosco

To: Carl R. who wrote (211)	11/28/2000 11:09:22 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 644

Carl, I think that there is a much greater "clear and present danger". It comes apparently from the "Freedom of information act". Apparently, in few months, historian should have access to the ballots under this act, and who knows, maybe in three to six months, they will come out with the total "recount" (not ten yars from now). If that recount shows that the then present president is in the WH without the plurality of electors, and without plurality in popular vote, there will be no constitutional way to reverse this (when they wrote the constitution, they did not have that act which let every citizen with a "good cause", like "History" look into secret or other documents), and then we may really have riots in the street. I think it would be best if they clean this thing here and now so we avoid such a potential bruhaha. Frankly, if Bush is sworn in and then it is found he should not have, because of the current delaying tactics, there will be major problems ahead. The funny thing, of course, such a future count under the Freedom of information act will have no legal bearing whatsoever, nor even great certainty that it was correctly done, and thus could nor be used to try and "right out a wrong", he'll have to go through the rest of his term with that yoke, unless, of course, somebody decided that another impeachment hearing is called for. A lot of troubles ahead.... Zeev