Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enam Luf who wrote (94361)	11/29/2000 4:16:22 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

COUNT THE FRIGGIN VOTES TP

To: Enam Luf who wrote (94361)	11/29/2000 5:20:03 PM
From: David R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

RE: "So we should stop science" No we should distinguish between physical science, and psuedo-science. That which is provable from that which is pure assumption. When the "science" says that we are nothing but physical matter reacting to external stimuli, i.e. the mind, love, hate, moral law, etc, are non-existent, there is no solid provable evidence to back up this grand metaphysical statement. But dare anybody to challenges this nonsense. A great amount of modern thought is a based on the radical materialistic worldview of a very small number of people. Beliefs that are neither reasonable nor provable. But because they have been dubbed "science" they have "reason" on their side. Anybody who disagrees is naturally "unreasonable".