Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (94904)	11/29/2000 9:31:12 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Let's see boies talk his team out of this one: x65.deja.com

To: SecularBull who wrote (94904)	11/29/2000 9:34:15 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Yeah. I saw Christopher on TV last night I think it was, and he was pretty subdued. I wonder how this whole thing will play out. It's very interesting. There was some Vietnamese-American dood on CNBC just now that brought up a really interesting point. He thinks that this legal thing is not about state's rights vs. federal rights, but more about liberal interpretation of existing law vs. conservative interpretation of existing law. I think he's right. That's why I have to laugh every time I hear Boies proclaim loudly to every judge he's in front of that the judge has this mighty awesome power. I think Boies has this idea that a judge has the power to pretty much interpret the law in whatever way he or she chooses. I think it's a very calculated attempt to lead a judge down whatever path Boies wants them to go. It worked pretty well in the Florida Supreme Court, but this Good Old Boy he's in front of now doesn't seem to be too exicted about Dave's concept of the law. It's really interesting. I understand both sides of the argument.