Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (119775)	11/30/2000 12:03:30 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

John, anyone else getting a partial SubjectMarks page only the last 2 days? Mine cuts off on the fifth subjectmark line. If not, how do you email a problem to SI? Thanks, Tony

To: Road Walker who wrote (119775)	11/30/2000 12:23:40 PM
From: ratan lal	Respond to of 186894

From an article in which a Zimbabwean politician Historical moment. USA being compared with Zimbabwe. Btter get my map out to see where it is and how big it is. May not be a bad idea to invest in their stocks. Cant be worse than NAZ right now.

To: Road Walker who wrote (119775)	11/30/2000 1:08:25 PM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

You are doing way too much imagining. Stop day dreaming.

To: Road Walker who wrote (119775)	11/30/2000 1:15:18 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

an article in which a Zimbabwean politician was John, okaaaaay, but what do Uganda, and Chad say??????

To: Road Walker who wrote (119775)	11/30/2000 1:31:45 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

John - Re: "the self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won based on some old colonial holdover (electoral college) from the nation's pre-democracy past. " The Rule Of Law is the LAW - our US Constitution. The Electoral College IS THE LAW. You can't advocate upholding "The Rule of Law" and at the same time try to destroy the existing laws. To do this (destroy existing laws) is "Zimbabbling" thinking at its best. Paul

To: Road Walker who wrote (119775)	11/30/2000 1:57:12 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "I got the following in an e-mail" John we could spend forever making analogies. Why not whine about the reigning political party's candidate losing the election, losing the recount, having the 100% stacked Florida SC rewrite the law give extra time to favor their guy who already lost twice, do a recount in hand picked counties specifically chosen to favor their man, change the rules repeatedly after the election was over, have their Democratic election officials divine the intention of the questionable ballots, have their Democratic officials be the final judge of the ballots, have their party distribute instructions on how to have military ballots rejected while claiming "we just want to make sure all the votes are counted". All this and their man still lost. Now after official certification the loser is today appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to once again ignore the Constitution and have the SC prevent the Florida Legislature from exercising their power by appointing the Electors should the loser keep the election results tied up in court. This is so pathetic even I am getting really embarrassed for this pathetic human being. Is there no humiliation he won't subject himself to? It's over. Plain and simple. It's over. Get over it. EP