SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bearcatbob who wrote (12953)11/30/2000 6:36:59 PM
From: russet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
Is it Chevron that has the 25% royalty on ELH? If so could they back in and become the operator,...anyone seen the legal agreement between Chevron and PYR,...or whoever??



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (12953)11/30/2000 6:55:28 PM
From: Robert McCullough  Respond to of 15703
 
If this well is the `boomer` it appears to be, the thinly traded JV`s current prices are no indication of what `takeout action` would finally be. A major accumulation of stock for control of any of them will be real expensive...



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (12953)11/30/2000 9:01:02 PM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15703
 
On the contrary - you always get a lot of talk about take-over prospects - it's the greatest market boosting device one can think of - but I stand by my contention - who would enter into a takeover bid for a player with say 5-7% of the play? All of the stocks would move more or less in unison -so to finish up with at least 51% of the play the bidder would have to pay the earth - and would have to deal with multiple boards, shareholder groups, etc. If BKP were the bidder it would run the risk of seeing it's stock languish or fall as the acquisitor - it would be strictly a no-win situation.

Far more likely would be a bid by a major for the property interest - much simpler and more practical. The bid would be on the basis of operational control or nothing. Or 100% or nothing.



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (12953)12/1/2000 11:20:58 AM
From: RIK  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15703
 
BCB .... So what do you think of the price that PYR paid for their additional 1.544% working interest in the ELH joint venture ?